Skip to main content

Communal Conflict in Shakespeare’s “”

By

Religious conflict between Christianity and the Judaism is clearly distinct in Shakespeare’s great tragicomedy ‘Merchant of Venice’. Here, Shakespeare makes Shylock, a Jew, the villain of the play and portrays negatively as much he can while the Christians are shown as great and noble. Now we are going to discuss the theme of racial conflict in the drama “Merchant of Venice”
 Though at that time the usury was completely legal, Shylock’s business usury is shown very contemptibly as if it were prohibited. Moreover his business of usury is often hampered by Antonio.  Antonio might be a good and sympathetic person but Shylock is not wrong in his activities. Antonio has no right to disturb him. Antonio does not like him only for religious facts.  As Shylock says:

“He hates our sacred nation; and evenWhere merchants most do congregate°, he railsOn me, my contracts,° and my well-earned profit,
Which he calls, usury”

            In the drama, Shylock, the Jew, is portrayed as greedy, vindictive, cruel and selfish person. He is also shown as the representative of his nation with evil activities. He wants to take revenge on the Christians. As he says:

“Cursèd be my tribe
If I forgive him.” 
 Here we see a communal conflict between Christianity and the Judaism. Shylock is severely oppressed by the Christians. Even Antonio calls him misbelieves, cut-throt dog; spite upon his dress; kicked him from the behind as Shylock himself confesses:
“… … He hath disgraced
me, and hindered me half a million times.    He hath laughed at my losses, mocked at my gains,scorned my nation, thwarted my ventures, cooled my friends, heated mine enemies—and what’shis reason?”

But what is the reason behind this? Of course, religion. Shylock can understand that, all the misbehaviour and oppressions is for that he is a Jew. So here we see a terrible communal conflict.   So he again says:     

 “I am a Jew.  Hath not a Jew eyes?  Hath  not a Jew hands, organs, arms, legs, senses, affections, desires?   Are we not, fed with the same food, hurt with the same weapons, subject to the same diseases, healed by the same means, warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer as a Christian is?  If you prick us, do we not bleed?  If you tickle us, do we not laugh?  If you poison us, do we not die?  And if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?  If we are like you in the rest, we will resemble you in that.  If a Jew wrongs a Christian, what kindness does he return? 

Here we see that, Shylock is shown as a Jew rather than a human character. Therefore, as we see, he wishes for nothing but the recognition as a human being rather than a Jew. Shylock feels that there is no physical difference between them, but why is the discrimination? So he ultimately becomes revengeful and says:
   
“ Revenge.  If a Christian wrong a Jew, what should his sufferance be, by Christian example?  Why, revenge.  The villainy   you teach me I will return unto you;   yet it shall go harder to you than it has come to me.” 
Again we find one kind of Christian religious domination over Judaism in his Daughter’s elopement with a Christian boy and her conversion to Christianity.  Here, the playwright deals Judaism with a great negligence. He shows that, a Jews’ daughter even does not like her own religion, which Shylock likes most.   As he mourns:
“‘My daughter!  O my ducats!  O my daughter!Fled with a Christian!  O my Christian ducats”

 Last of all, we can say, Shakespeare deliberately shows a communal or religious conflict between the Christianity and Judaism in order to depict the real picture of his time. So his creation surpasses the limitation of time and becomes a great literary wonder in realm of English literature.    

This paper is prepared for you by Talim Enam, BA (Hons), MA in English.
If you have any query, suggestion or complain regarding the article, please feel free to contact me at +8801722335969. You can also follow me at www.fb.com/talimenam and www.fb.com/enamur and visit my blog http://talimenam.blogspot.com

Please pray for me, if you find the article beneficial to you, and never forget to add your valuable comments. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Critical Analysis of Poem "No Second Troy" by William Butler Yeats

By
  " No Second Troy " by William Butler Yeats, a great Irish poet, is poem about the love relationship between the poet and Maud Gonne , devastatingly beautiful Irish woman. It is one of the great literary love stories of the 20th century. The poem hints that how an alluring dazzling beauty can cause a devastating massive distraction with the reference to Helen of Troy, from the Iliad and the Aeneid . Now we will critically look into the poem. Before discussing the poem, let us have a look at the background of the poem. Yeats, in fact, published the poem in 1916 in the collection “ Responsibilities and Other Poems” , after he had already proposed to Gonne; and been rejected on numerous occasions. Yeats was obsessed with her and pursued her for over a decade and dedicated many of his poems to her. In this poem, however, Yeats's attitude is somewhat harsh, as he compares Gonne with the infamously beautiful and notoriously mi
30 comments
Read a little more »

“My Last Duchess” as a Dramatic Monologue

By
 What is dramatic monologue? Evaluate Robert Browning's  “My Last Duchess” as a Dramatic Monologue “My Last Duchess” is a fantastic dramatic monologue comp osed by a great Victorian poet Robert Robert Browning . A dramatic monologue, traditionally, includes lyrical strain, abrupt beginning, single speaker, silent listener, psychological analysis and clues to suggest what the silent listener says or does . Now we will see how the poem contains all these elements of a dramatic monologue. The poem begins with the dramatic suddenness : “That’s my last Duchess painted on the wall, Looking as if she were alive.” The readers can understand that the event has begun earlier.  But the poem begins from the middle to make the start dramatic.  As the poem progress, it becomes clear that only a single person speaks . The speaker is the Duke of Ferrara talking about his dead duchess’ portrait painted by Fra Pandlof. At several points of the poem, it becomes evident that there
15 comments
Read a little more »

Bacon’s Prose Style as We Find in His Essays

By
Francis Bacon, (1561-1626) is the most influential and resourceful English writer of his time. He very expertly uses different types of literary devices like paradox, aphorism, climax in his essays. He usually uses the condensed sentences with deep hidden explanations. We also find a touch of reality and practicality in his writings. Now we are going to discuss his views. Bacon very skilfully exploits the literary device ‘paradox’ in the essay “ Of Truth” . Truth, according to Bacon, lacks the charm of variety which, falsehood has. Truth gives more pleasure only when a lie is added to it.  He believes that, falsehood is a source of temporary enjoyment as it gives the people a strange kind of pleasure. So the essayist paradoxically says: “ …a mixture of a lie doth ever add pleasure” We find another paradoxical maxim in the same essay .  To Bacon, a liar is brave towards god but cowardly towards men. A liar does not have courage to tell the truth to the people but he sho
17 comments
Read a little more »