Skip to main content

Imagery in Keats’ ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’

     Write an essay on the use of imagery in Keats’ ‘Ode on a Grecian Urn’

Johan Keats, (1795-1821) a great word painter of Romantic era, in “Ode on a Grecian Urn”, conveys his philosophy about art, beauty and life to the readers with colourful and intense imagery. So the poem is notable for its profoundly persuasive imagery taken from nature. Now we are going to discuss it in our following discussion.  
        
  Before entering into the discussion, we are to know what the imagery is. Imagery is the collective form of image and suggests the total picture produced by the images. The word image has derived from the Latin word ‘imago which means ‘likeness’. An image is, therefore, likeness of something. In other words, it is basically the picture of a particular thing. In literature, pictures are drawn with words. So Spurgeon defines it as ‘picture in words’. Let us now cast our eyes over various images which he uses in the poem.

At the very beginning of the poem, Keats uses an excellent image by a metaphor to reveal the exact description of the ‘Urn’ which he has seen in the British Museum.  
        “Thou still unravish'd bride of quietness,”
Just after reading this ‘unrevised bride’ a picture of “a beautiful bride sitting and waiting for her groom” is depicted in our mind. The poet uses the image to state the beauty and the purity of the Urn.
We find another image indicating the Urn:
“Sylvan historian, who canst thus express
  A flowery tale more sweetly than our rhyme:”  

It means that, the Urn can express tales with the depiction on its surface better than the historian can do with their writings.
leaf-fringed legend” is also an image which indicates that the Urn is decorated with various scenes especially with trees and woods. As the poet states:
    “What leaf-fringed legend haunts about thy shape”

Again, at the end of first stanza, the poet creates some images for the picture on the Urn with some rhetorical question which are vivid and passionate.
“What men or gods are these? what maidens loth?
What mad pursuit? What struggle to escape?What pipes and timbrels? What wild ecstasy? 
There is another image of a lover stooping to kiss his beloved.
“Bold lover, never, never cast thou kiss,
Though winning near the goal.”
 
Seeing the boughs full of leaves and melodist piper songs, Keats thinks that the spring of the boughs will be and the melodist will pipe songs forever, but he himself is suffering the distress, misery and frustration and will also suffer. As narrates the poet:                                                                   
“Ah happy, happy boughs! That cannot shed
Your leaves, moreover bid the spring adieu
And happy melodist unwearied,
For ever piping songs for ever new;”

In another image, a continuing vivid picture is depicted in our mind. There is a procession going toward a place of worship led by an unknown mysterious priest who leads a young calf for the sacrifice.  The calf of up-raised head is decorated with garlands of flowers. As the poet describes:
“Who are these coming to the sacrifice?To what green altar, O mysterious priest.” 
There is another image of an empty town of situated by a river or a sea shore or a mountain. In a chaste morning there is no soul to tell why the streets are silent, because all have gone to a distant alter to worship. Keats says:
“What little town by the river or sea shore,Or mountain-built with peaceful citadel,”

However the silence of the town will be forever, because it is an art or an imagination, not reality.

At the last stanza of the poem, the poet addresses the Urn fair attitude that contains marble men and over-excited maidens and cold pastoral. These are the excellent images which the poet uses in the poem to describe the magnificence of the urn.   


We must conclude our discussion saying that, John Keats very expertly exploits imagery to utter his inner grief and agony in the poem “Ode on a Grecian Urn”. So he can rightly be considered as the master of imagery of the   Romantic period in English literature.  
This paper is prepared for you by Talim Enam, BA (Hons), MA in English.
If you have any query, suggestion or complain regarding the article, please feel free to contact me at +8801722335969. You can also follow me at www.fb.com/talimenam and www.fb.com/enamur and visit my blog http://talimenam.blogspot.com
 Please pray for me, if you find the article beneficial to you, and never forget to add your valuable comments. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Critical Analysis of Poem "No Second Troy" by William Butler Yeats

  " No Second Troy " by William Butler Yeats, a great Irish poet, is poem about the love relationship between the poet and Maud Gonne , devastatingly beautiful Irish woman. It is one of the great literary love stories of the 20th century. The poem hints that how an alluring dazzling beauty can cause a devastating massive distraction with the reference to Helen of Troy, from the Iliad and the Aeneid . Now we will critically look into the poem. Before discussing the poem, let us have a look at the background of the poem. Yeats, in fact, published the poem in 1916 in the collection “ Responsibilities and Other Poems” , after he had already proposed to Gonne; and been rejected on numerous occasions. Yeats was obsessed with her and pursued her for over a decade and dedicated many of his poems to her. In this poem, however, Yeats's attitude is somewhat harsh, as he compares Gonne with the infamously beautiful and notoriously mi...

Bacon’s Prose Style as We Find in His Essays

Francis Bacon, (1561-1626) is the most influential and resourceful English writer of his time. He very expertly uses different types of literary devices like paradox, aphorism, climax in his essays. He usually uses the condensed sentences with deep hidden explanations. We also find a touch of reality and practicality in his writings. Now we are going to discuss his views. Bacon very skilfully exploits the literary device ‘paradox’ in the essay “ Of Truth” . Truth, according to Bacon, lacks the charm of variety which, falsehood has. Truth gives more pleasure only when a lie is added to it.  He believes that, falsehood is a source of temporary enjoyment as it gives the people a strange kind of pleasure. So the essayist paradoxically says: “ …a mixture of a lie doth ever add pleasure” We find another paradoxical maxim in the same essay .  To Bacon, a liar is brave towards god but cowardly towards men. A liar does not have courage to tell the truth to the people b...

The Difference between Tragedy and the Whole Truth

The Difference between Tragic Literature  and Non-tragic Literature Aldous Huxley (1894-1963), a great literary critic, highly individualistic writer and a major modern essayist, shows the difference between tragic literature, containing partial truth and the non-tragic literature, containing whole truth, in his master-piece essay “ Tragedy and the Whole Truth ”. Here he also shows the superiority of the whole truth over the tragedy.  Now we are going to discuss the difference between tragedy and the whole truth in detail. In order to know the difference between tragedy and the whole truth, we are, at first, to know what the truth is. We generally find two types of truth. First one is actual truth and another one is literary truth. To Huxley, two and two makes four, or Queen Victoria came to the throne in 1837 or light travels at the rate of 187000 miles a second is the example of actual truth.  But in literature we may not find such kind of t...