Skip to main content

Oedipus the King: a Tragic Hero or Victim of Fate

“Oedipus the King”, Sophocles’ most artistic creation, is a play on a mythical king Oedipus based on the Theban Legend. It is the tragedy of a hero who has been made zero and led away from the country most miserably. 

            We know that a tragic hero usually possesses high birth and high social standard. In case of Oedipus, we see that, he is the son of “Laius”, the king, and “Jocasta”, the queen, he is brought up by Polibus, the king of Corinth, and “Merpe the queen. Later he has become the king of Thebes and marries the queen of Thebes and begets children. The people of Thebes considers him as the saviour and father.

            Actually, Oedipus is the hero of the tragedy of fate or destiny or nemesis based on the oracle of Apollo that Oedipus would kill his father and would marry his own mother. All the characters of the play have tried desperately to avoid the occurrence what they could not do. Laius and Jocasta have tried to escape the happenings by sending away their new born child to a distant mountain. Oedipus himself tried to escape the undesirable situation by leaving Corinth, but all in vain.

            Here the characters seem to be the puppet of destiny.  Whatever they do, wherever they go are predesigned by destiny, an unseen mysterious power.

A tragic hero is a man of good character and excellent qualities. In case of Oedipus, we see that, he is very brave and benevolent king. Once he has saved the peoples of Thebes from the riddle of Sphinx by his intellect. He is full of patriotic feelings. When he comes to know that, until and unless the killer of Laius is detected and punished no betterment of country would be done, he tries his best to detect the killer even, when he comes across that, he himself is the killer, he banishes himself from the country. So he is very good man and king. As he himself says:
“I grieve for you, my children
Believe me, I know,
All that you desire of me, all that you suffer.”

Again he says:
“Their plight concern me now; more than my life”

A tragic hero, according to Aristotle, usually has a Hamartia or tragic flaw or some defect of his character. Consequently, though Oedipus the King is a tragedy of fate or nemesis, we discover some hamertia or tragic flaw in Oedipus, though it is a tragedy of fate. The author of Oedipus was much ahead from time, he painted his characters with the touch of reality and liberty of choice.

            As a king he should have been very cool and calculative in stead of being arrogant, haughty, desperate, rough and tough. So his tragic fallow is mainly his hot temperament. We can give a number of examples:
Firstly: he has killed a man who is almost equal aged like his father. Then his treatment with Crion and with the blind prophet was very rough.   As he says:
“It has – but not for you;
No, not for you, shameless and brainless sightless, senseless sot!”

Again, he puts very severe doubts on Crion, a very loyal, faithful, patriotic man in Thebes. As Oedipus says:
“I doubt your eloquence will teach me much. You are my bitterest enemy; that I know.”

He seems very angry, when he speaks with the shepherd. So he is terrific anger is his tragic flaw.

            If we analyze Oedipus from a different perspective, we see that, he has a tendency to undergo the truth. He is always in a desperate mood to know the unknown, to explore the unexplored, to see the unseen. This kind of tendency is a highly modern man quality.

             We know that, a tragic hero suffers a lot due to his hamartia. In Oedipus the King , Oedipus suffers a lot. When he knows he has killed his father married his own mother, he reaches the climax of his sufferings and made his eyes blind. His sufferings can better be understood by his own speech:
“Alas! All out! All known, no more concealment!
O Light! May I never look on you again,
revealed as I am sinful my begetting, in my marriage, shedding of blood.”

Here seeing the suffering of Oedipus, we fall in extreme sadness and we feel petty for him.
Moreover, we find a strong analogy between Hamlet and King Oedipus.  Both of them are the hero of the tragedy. Hamlet suffers a lot due to his Hamartia as Oedipus does.

We can also analyze Oedipus with the light of psychoanalytic theory of Sigmund Freud. To him, the sons become attracted to their mother, the daughters become attracted to their father. This is what happened in Oedipus and Freud calls it “Oedipus Complex


At last we can say that, Oedipus, the most artistic creation of master playwright Sophocles, is a unique tragic hero not   only in Greek tragedy but also in world tragedy. He wins the sympathy of all the readers because he is the victim of fate as well as the victim of circumstances. 


This paper is prepared for you by Talim Enam, BA (Hons), MA in English.
If you have any query, suggestion or complain regarding the article, please feel free to contact me at +8801722335969. You can also follow me at www.fb.com/talimenam and www.fb.com/enamur and visit my blog http://talimenam.blogspot.com

Please pray for me, if you find the article beneficial to you, and never forget to add your valuable comments. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Critical Analysis of Poem "No Second Troy" by William Butler Yeats

  " No Second Troy " by William Butler Yeats, a great Irish poet, is poem about the love relationship between the poet and Maud Gonne , devastatingly beautiful Irish woman. It is one of the great literary love stories of the 20th century. The poem hints that how an alluring dazzling beauty can cause a devastating massive distraction with the reference to Helen of Troy, from the Iliad and the Aeneid . Now we will critically look into the poem. Before discussing the poem, let us have a look at the background of the poem. Yeats, in fact, published the poem in 1916 in the collection “ Responsibilities and Other Poems” , after he had already proposed to Gonne; and been rejected on numerous occasions. Yeats was obsessed with her and pursued her for over a decade and dedicated many of his poems to her. In this poem, however, Yeats's attitude is somewhat harsh, as he compares Gonne with the infamously beautiful and notoriously mi

Bacon’s Prose Style as We Find in His Essays

Francis Bacon, (1561-1626) is the most influential and resourceful English writer of his time. He very expertly uses different types of literary devices like paradox, aphorism, climax in his essays. He usually uses the condensed sentences with deep hidden explanations. We also find a touch of reality and practicality in his writings. Now we are going to discuss his views. Bacon very skilfully exploits the literary device ‘paradox’ in the essay “ Of Truth” . Truth, according to Bacon, lacks the charm of variety which, falsehood has. Truth gives more pleasure only when a lie is added to it.  He believes that, falsehood is a source of temporary enjoyment as it gives the people a strange kind of pleasure. So the essayist paradoxically says: “ …a mixture of a lie doth ever add pleasure” We find another paradoxical maxim in the same essay .  To Bacon, a liar is brave towards god but cowardly towards men. A liar does not have courage to tell the truth to the people but he sho

“My Last Duchess” as a Dramatic Monologue

 What is dramatic monologue? Evaluate Robert Browning's  “My Last Duchess” as a Dramatic Monologue “My Last Duchess” is a fantastic dramatic monologue comp osed by a great Victorian poet Robert Robert Browning . A dramatic monologue, traditionally, includes lyrical strain, abrupt beginning, single speaker, silent listener, psychological analysis and clues to suggest what the silent listener says or does . Now we will see how the poem contains all these elements of a dramatic monologue. The poem begins with the dramatic suddenness : “That’s my last Duchess painted on the wall, Looking as if she were alive.” The readers can understand that the event has begun earlier.  But the poem begins from the middle to make the start dramatic.  As the poem progress, it becomes clear that only a single person speaks . The speaker is the Duke of Ferrara talking about his dead duchess’ portrait painted by Fra Pandlof. At several points of the poem, it becomes evident that there